Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(32)
(Charges have been omitted here for simplicity).
As Merrill's fans know, the "missing" years were those that saw the production of his three-part supernatural epic, "The Changing Light at Sandover" -- omitted here for reasons of space.
It is omitted here for brevity.
The details are omitted here for brevity.
Details are omitted here for the reader.
The details are omitted here for the sake of brevity.
Similar(28)
Moreover, The integrals in (A.3), (A.4) and (A.5) can be calculated analytically, we omit here for brevity.
The sum computation is omitted here and hereafter for terminology simplicity.
The proof is omitted here; see [7] for more details.
Proof According to inequality (4.3), we obtain ∑ n = 1 m ( ∑ k = n m a k k + d ) p + p p B m p ∑ n = 1 m ( n + d ) p − n p ( n + d ) p + 1 ≥ p p ∑ n = 1 m a n p. The following proof is the same as the relevant proof for Corollary 2, omitted here.
Note: Pennsylvania's districts have been redrawn for 2018, so they are omitted here.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com