Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(21)
The difference with direct discrimination is that it is a moral failure of omission, i.e., failing to count for something the impact of the promotion policy on blacks, rather than a failure of commission, such as deliberately excluding blacks from better-paying positions.
Additionally, two measures of omission (i.e., total and average), and two measures of commission (i.e., total and average) were also calculated for the current distribution model output.
The latter is also sometimes called therapy omission, i.e. the omission of drug treatment that is clinically indicated and likely to be beneficial for the patient.
We designed a PCR test to investigate whether this was due to a sequencing omission (i.e. this particular region of the genome had not been sequenced).
These data also facilitate the assessment and measurement of errors of omission, i.e., the lack of use of appropriate drugs when needed.
This line of thinking is consistent with omission bias, a frequently observed cognitive bias in decision-making in which harms (i.e., HIV infection) due to acts of commission (i.e., trial participation) tend to result in greater regret than harms due to acts of omission (i.e., not using a condom) [ 40, 41].
Similar(39)
Omission Is Murder for Feminist Media Art Pioneer Lynn Hershman Leeson.
By contrast, the highest dose of guanfacine (1.0 mg·kg−1) increased % omissions (i.e. reduced attention) in both genotypes.
Together with this superior accuracy, H mice generally showed more omissions (i.e. less readiness to respond) than C mice.
Concerning omission errors, there was a main effect of group, F 1, 38) = 15.67, p < 0.001, with patients making more omissions (i.e., failing to turn the counter over) than controls.
Likewise they had fewer "omissions" (i.e., fewer missed targets) when tested on medication compared to their performance off medication F 1,15) = 9.90, p < .01, η = .40, but no differences for incorrect responses to non-targets ("commissions").
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com