Sentence examples for of weak methodology from inspiring English sources

Generally, the studies were of weak methodology.

These spectacular results must be considered with caution because of weak methodology resulting from the retrospective nature of the study.

Trials were subjected to methodological assessments by the 10 point Delphi/PedRo checklists [ 36]. as trials of weaker methodology have been found to exaggerate results in a positive direction [ 37].

However, knowledge on this topic is still preliminary, as demonstrated by the presence of low quality studies due to weak methodology, small number of patients and short-term follow-up.

The findings from the systematic review by Joss-Vassalli et al.[9] were presented, which demonstrated a weak evidence base (with studies being retrospective in nature and of low-to-moderate value of evidence), weak methodology, short-term follow up and a significant number of confounding variables, which were not controlled for.

However, the authors see the main limitation of their review in the weak methodology of the included trails.

Absent from the Breitbart article was my definition of party raiding, as well as the distinction between my "survival of the weakest" methodology and Limbaugh's "slow down the frontrunner" approach.

The result is that innovative research is being conducted outside the frame of the quite long tradition of evaluation contests in this area, with the disadvantage of weaker evaluation methodologies.

In general, the methodology of weak signals and wild cards is part of the process of horizon or environmental scanning [10, 27, 34], and as such, it situates in the interpretative domain [9].

In this paper we conduct a small experiment on applying a methodology of weak signals and wild cards in the case of water supply and sanitation services.1 Weak signals and wild cards have typically been analysed in the context of corporate decision-making or national foresight processes.

Health system impacts of service integration are however inconclusive due to poor evidence because of weak or incomparable evaluation methodologies [ 18- 20].