Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Data evaluation consisted of a one-way analysis of variance on the same type defects between obturation groups followed by a Scheffé post-hoc test.
Statistical analysis was performed comparing the biopsy culture results using Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks and Dunn's method for pairwise comparison.
The daily maximum depth values for 30M, 40M and 41F were not significantly different (Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks p = <0.06).
Data was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks.
*** significant difference of P < 0.001, based on Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks.
The differences between the studied groups were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis one way test of variance on ranks.
These differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.2, Kruskal-Wallis test with one-way analysis of variance on ranks).
P values refer to one-way analysis of variance on repeated measures (for different levels of pressure support).
Data that failed the normality test were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks.
To investigate reproducibility, we performed a one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) on the repeated lacunarity values from each diagnostic group.
Statistical analyses were performed using the Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance on ranks, followed by Dunnett's method (*P < 0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com