Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
While the wholly sedentary volunteers, and there were many of these, scored significantly worse over the years on tests of cognitive function, the most active group showed little decline.
All of these scored zero.
Fourteen of 42 (33%) children with SLI had an ICC this low, and nine of these scored below the lowest ICC of any control (less than −0.3).
If more than one selected activity was included in the same category, a median value of these scored activities was used to score the category.
Most of them corresponded to the hit with the highest score, but those of the genes uvrC, MHP7448_0198 and ktrA were the second best hits (although none of these scored higher than 6.5).
One of these scored poorly on both quality assessments [ 33], and one other [ 5], scored poorly on one set of criteria [ 22] and lower than most of the other studies on the other [ 25].
Similar(53)
A simple translation of these scoring systems into different languages and cultures is not sufficient.
Two studies have examined the ability of these scoring systems to predict functional outcome following treatment [30, 31].
However, the isolated use of these scoring systems to guide decision-making in sepsis has been heavily criticized [5].
A report of any of these was scored as abuse.
Nevertheless, 20-30% of these disorders scored low (<4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com