None of these outcome indicators evaluated disability, quality of life or patients' satisfaction with care.
The inter-correlations of these outcome measures were fair to moderate supporting their distinctiveness.
In addition, ACT had superior effect in most of these outcome parameters, compared to the control groups.
The non-academic public might make use of these outcome values if only they could understand what a Beta score means.
First, as a placebo test, we examine the impact of the reform year-by-year for each of these outcome measures, see Figures 10a and b.
The response rate of the cohort is shown for each of these outcome measures – headache days, pain intensity and a combination of headache days and/or pain intensity.
Each of these outcome sequences is unified by a homogenous kind of trial; as such, they may all be suitable sequences to play a role in RCT.
As expected, depression and delinquency scores were significantly correlated, although the significant predictors of these outcome measures were found to be quite distinct.
For each of these outcome measures, we estimate a model specification that includes youth minimum wage dummies as well as a model specification with both youth minimum wage dummies and proxies for the relative level of youth minimum wages, i.e., the youth-to-adult minimum wage and the youth-to-median wage ratios see columns (ii), (iii) and (iv).
Both of these outcome types arise in clinical settings.
Changes in each of these outcome variables are described below.
