Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(29)
R 2 also indicated that only 2.30%% of the total variations could not be explained by the model.
Results indicated that 86% of the total variations of Rtn were explained by three significant spatial structures (EOFs).
From Table 3, the value of R2 is 0.77, showing that about 77 % of the total variations in the trip time can be accounted for the independent variables.
VF3 explained 9.47% of the total variations and eigenvalue of 2.37 had strong positive loadings on DOS and DO and negative on PO4 3−.
Pertaining to R2 that is indicative of model fitting, its value was 0.94 which means that 6% of the total variations were not explained by the model.
A fairly high R2 value of 0.9983 implies that the regression model was statistically significant and only 0.17%% of the total variations was not explained by the model.
Similar(31)
(c) Proportion of the total variation: Here the deal is the proportion of the total variation contributed by those factors.
Symmetry explained nearly half of the total variation in dance ability for the men.
As computed, the structural variation accounted for approximately 50% of the total variation.
The corresponding R2 value explains the 24%% of the total variation.
On average, 24% of the total variation in the data was due to measurement error.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com