Exact(14)
The final models for A2 and B2 scenarios explained 59.1% and 59.2% of the total deviance, respectively, and retained variables of the four factors (see Table 3).
Hanski and Saccheri (2006) also identified heterozygosity (MLH) as having an important role within population dynamics, accounting for 26% of the total deviance in a model developed for population extinction events within fragmented Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia) populations.
This model parameter was best accounted for by the CG factor (9% of the total deviance).
However, the model only explained 2% of the total deviance in the data.
The PD factor best accounted for Discrete time (31% of the total deviance) and Model specificity (18%).
The PD factor best accounted for Diploidy (65% of the total deviance), Resistance dominance (58%), Initial resistance (18%) and Mutation rate (10%).
Similar(46)
The model was fitted by minimising the total deviance.
17 18 Model fitness will be assessed with the deviance information criterion (DIC) and the posterior mean of the total residual deviance.
Parameters for these models were estimated by minimising the sum of total deviance and lead time penalty (mean lead time × penalty).
Variability in coverage was primarily explained by population factors, with general practice characteristics only accounting for a small fraction of the residual variability (<2% of total deviance after adjustment for population factors).
It probably helps explaining, in addition to complex structure of the explained variable, why the best model explained only 14.43% of total deviance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com