The researchers then ran eight other versions of the same experiment.
We later did a variation of the same experiment, at the University of Chicago, to look at a different kind of motivator: public scrutiny.
We're currently conducting a more controlled version of the same experiment in the lab, which we'd anticipate including in the journal article as a validation of the online experiment.
This means that the results of an experiment performed at one location in space and time can be used to predict correctly the outcome of the same experiment in another part of space and time.
Ten repetitions of the same experiment were performed.
During the process of nanosnakes growth, four replicas of the same experiment were run in parallel.
The results of this experiment are shown in Figures 11 and 12, averaged over 30 runs of the same experiment.
On the other hand, Fig. 11 b shows the results of the same experiment for a 20% failure rate.
We also conducted a variation of the same experiment, at the University of Chicago, to look at a different kind of motivator: public scrutiny.
This method uses a simple and fast numerical technique to compare data from calibration experiment on accelerator with data from Monte Carlo simulation of the same experiment.
The measured displacement field and the subsequently computed strain field are compared with a finite element simulation of the same experiment.
