Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
These findings support the utility of the revised items and the validity of the BFNE-II as a measure of the fear of negative evaluation.
Cognitive testing of the revised items is suggested to ensure items are understood as intended.
Similar(58)
The revised item pool consisted of 13 items with a Flesch-Kincaid Readability Grade-level of 5.3.
Note: All issues in above table were identified by at least 2 children To ensure comprehension of the 35 revised items, a second set of cognitive interviews was conducted.
The final set (6j-6 l) of revised items addresses the parent's sense of efficacy, specifically a sense of their own control over their children's oral health behaviors.
The third set (6 g-6i) of revised items concerns parental attitudes about the value they place on oral health as it affects the child's life course.
The research team revised items of concern to two or more participants and reached a consensus on all items.
From these discussions, we created a preliminary list of target concepts and alternative conceptions and revised items for the DCI.
Thus, component studies published before the publication of revised STRICTA may not address some revised items assessed in this review.
To assess psychometric properties of the revised 15-item Impact on Family (IOF) Scale.
To the 24 items of the revised FAQ1, 12 items from the FAMHQ (See Table 1) were added.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com