If the actual status of the comparator w is faulty, then w may produce an unpredictable comparison result.
An identical process would need to be undertaken to estimate costs and outcomes of the comparator intervention, so that DDP can be compared incrementally to establish cost-effectiveness.
An improvement of the comparator (BMS) over time could have resulted in smaller differences compared to DES.
Analytical equations for guiding the design of the comparator circuitry are derived.
Out of the comparator, we basically have an indication of what the difference is, and that represents an error between the desired and the true angle.
The changes of correlation between the vectors of vibration signals at the points of the comparator on varying the quantization interval are presented in graphs.
Charge-sharing comparator is proposed in this work, which reduces the dynamic power dissipation and kickback noise of the comparator circuit.
The infusion of the comparator also increased the plasma volume by 9.6% (1 h), 5.8% (2 h) and 4.9% (3 h) compared with the values before infusion.
The required gates, i.e. X-OR and AND gates for the implementation of the comparator in frequency encoded format are also discussed.
To make the power consumption of the comparator scale down with respect to the comparison rate, the fully dynamic comparator is used.
The output of the comparator is a square wave, whose duty cycle is determined by amount of the time that the voltage of the input signal is higher than the reference voltage.
