Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
His current NEH project is a study of the annotations in a heavily annotated copy of the 1525 edition of Ptolemy's Geography.
The annotators both rejected 10.5% of the annotations and accepted 60.7%.
For assessing the quality of the annotations (i.e., inter-annotator reliability), we used the Fleiss' kappa metric [36].
The high quality of the annotations is illustrated by inter-annotator agreement levels of up to 0.92 F-score.
Getting rid of the annotations seemed problematic.
Table 1: A summary of the annotations of three reviewers.
"The seller had scanned and displayed about fifteen or sixteen of the annotations," Koppelman went on.
A summary of the annotations of each reviewer is given in Table 1.
Giving researchers access to all of the annotations that could be relevant to a specimen is challenging.
The snippet can include any subset of the annotations.
(See Table 1 for an explanation of the annotations).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com