Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together was shown above the branches.
Reproducibility of replicate determinations was better than ± 0.2‰.
Error bars represent standard error of replicate data (n = 6).
Open symbols indicate average of replicate uninoculated negative control bottles.
Relative standard deviation of replicate samples (n = 6) was 2.19%.
Absolute deviations of replicate samples were within 0.1 ‰ for δ34SSO4 and δ18OSO4 [see Additional file 2].
Table 1 presents the comparison of replicate grading (n = 77 eyes) with the original grading.
Filled symbols indicate average of replicate bottles inoculated with bacterial strains.
Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of replicate determinations (n ≥ 3).
The variance of replicate analyses for bioavailable PAHs was 3% (1 relative SD).
Error bars represent the standard deviation of replicate measurements/batch (n = 3). Figure S3.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com