Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Furthermore, ANA testing by IIF is complicated by the number of positive patterns attainable (>50), which necessitates interpretation by a pathologist and requires appropriate confirmation tests.
The ordinate is defined as the proportion of beneficial patterns in the haplogroups = 100× (Number of positive patterns found in haplogroup)/(Total number of patterns found in haplogroup).
From the two plots we can observe that the positive observations are covered by a majority of positive patterns, while the negative ones are covered by a majority of negative patterns.
Significant and beneficial differences of corrective patterns in relation to the resting position were also found in both types of symmetric exercises (P < 0.05), where the proportion of positive patterns of bioelectrical muscle activity was close to 80%.
Similar(56)
Subjects then received 18 sessions of positive patterning.
Each patient belonging to class P+++ satisfies 50 90% of the positive patterns (68.5% on average), whereas each patient belonging to P+ satisfies only 10 30% of the positive patterns (20% on average).
Each patient belonging to the class N satisfies 50 70% of the negative patterns (57.5% on average), whereas each patient belonging to N- satisfies only 5 35% of the positive patterns (20% on average).
The weighting procedure consists simply of comparing the proportion of the displayed positive patterns in the set of all positive patterns contained in the model (pandect), with the analogous proportion of negative patterns.
Based on the frequency of inclusion of genes in the positive patterns, it can be seen that Contig65439 (chromosome 20 open reading frame 178) plays a significant role in determining a poor prognosis, because it appears in 10 of the 20 positive patterns of the model.
This heat map shows pairs of mtSNPs found in positive patterns across all haplogroups.
Ideally, the positive patterns of a model would cover exclusively positive observations, while its negative patterns would cover only negative observations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com