Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
CNV: (somatic) Copy number variation; OR: Odds ratio; PAR%: Population attributable risk percent; RPB: The 'naïve' Ratio of population benefit; SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism.
Finally we propose an index – the 'naïve' ratio of population benefit (RPB) – for quantifying overall risk/benefit of using a biomarker for cancer prevention or detection/prediction at the population level.
We propose an index which takes into account potential adverse consequences of biomarker-driven interventions – the 'naïve' ratio of population benefit (RPB) – to facilitate evaluating the potential impact of biomarkers on cancer prevention and personalized medicine.
Since false positive and false negative classifications are unavoidable in practice [ 12], we propose an index, the 'naïve' ratio of population benefit (RPB), which takes into account the adverse effects of misclassification, for evaluating the impact of using biomarkers for early detection/risk prediction and preventive interventions on a disease at the population level.
Similar(56)
The results are displayed in Fig. 7. Fig. 7 Percentage of population benefiting from the reform.
Evidence-based medicine is typically promoted on the basis of superior clinical outcomes while the costs of changing to it, borne by individual organizations and practitioners, are downplayed in favour of population benefits [ 2].
9 19 60 Such a ban would lead to health benefits at least twice as large as other policy options, both in terms of total population benefit and reduction in inequality.
By contrast in a scenario without competitors, the surviving individuals of an affected population benefit from increased resource availability.
To start an early physical rehabilitation program, knowledge of which patient population benefit from the program is required.
Such companies create demand and jobs in other fields, of course, but the share of the population benefiting from the boom remains tiny.
All sectors of the population benefitted from stronger growth, with those at the bottom doing rather better than those at the top.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com