Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "of of" is not correct or usable in written English.
It is grammatically incorrect and does not make sense in a sentence. It is possible that you may have accidentally repeated the word "of" twice in a sentence, but it should be corrected. Incorrect: The book of of Shakespeare is my favorite. Correct: The book of Shakespeare is my favorite. You would use "of" in a sentence to indicate possession or belonging, such as "the book of Shakespeare." It can also be used to show a relationship between two nouns, such as "the city of Paris." Repeating the word "of" does not serve a purpose or convey any meaning.
Exact(52)
Several of of them reminisced about Armstrong.
Lester MacNamara, dir. of of the N.J.
Or the easy-when-you-spot-it type: "Of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of (10)" – OFTENTIMES, naturally.
And really, the expansiveness of- of- of- of what you- the subject matter and- and- and the intersections of- of- of the subject matter that you're working.
Announced the retirement of OF T.J. Bartosh.
Announced the retirement of OF Marquis Grissom.
Similar(8)
But we did disapprove of of the plan.
There's a kind of… of course… but I like it.
Out of range of Ahmet.
The axis of … of what, exactly?
"Well, we sat around, and smoked the odd bit of… of… of dope and read poetry.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com