Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Data are sorted in descending order of mean importance ratings.
Similar(58)
We assessed whether a relationship existed between the level of importance of each factor (mean importance rating) and the agreement (SDs) and no linear relationship was found.
All except 3 of the items concerning quality of treatment were of relatively high mean importance (>70 points) for the patients.
Most of the items concerning quality of treatment are believed to be of relatively high mean importance (>70 points) for the patients as assessed by the physicians.
The importance of each indicator was calculated as the mean importance of the underlying items.
Age of respondents and non-English speaking background did not significantly influence the mean importance score of any of the other factors identified.
Descriptive analysis and the Mann-Whitney U test are used to determine the mean importance of the housing attributes and to compare the findings from each group.
For instance, the three items on indicator 1.1 (bodily care) had an average importance of 2.97, whereas the mean importance over all 15 indicators was 3.10.
Mean importance of items ranged from 2.77 (watery eyes) to 4.59 (sleep well) on a 1 to 5 scale, with very similar patterns to those found in the first study.
Unemployed patients rated the importance of performing paid work with a mean score of 3.4 (2.3) and employed patients' mean importance score was 6.7 (0.6.7
The mean importance scores of the 70 items ranged from 4.65 for competence of the physician to 1.38 for presence of a cloakroom at the outpatient department.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com