Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
It is made up of judicial, practitioner and academic experts.
Similar(59)
JHA opposes HB2265 because we agree with the consensus of experts and practitioners who have found that the wise use of judicial discretion is more effective at preventing crime than mandatory minimum sentences.
cIn the 2010 study on the future of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU a mix of academics, policy makers and practitioners were used as SPOCs (Vermeulen, De Bondt, & Ryckman, 2012b).
Legal scholars and practitioners outside China should not take this remark as a complete rebuke of the principle of judicial independence.
Is judicial secrecy defensible in an era of judicial supremacy?
Gave New York 50 years of Judicial service.
Their court is guilty of judicial activism.
"Whatever the virtues of judicial minimalism," he wrote, "it cannot justify judicial incoherence".
Judicial restraint, a procedural or substantive approach to the exercise of judicial review.
We disagree, and so do years of judicial precedent.
The rest is a matter of judicial co-operation".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com