"of international commitments" is a correct phrase and can be used in written English.
It is usually used to refer to agreements or promises made by a country to other countries or international organizations. Example: The government is struggling to meet its of international commitments to reduce carbon emissions by 30% by 2030.
Last year's nuclear agreement with world powers has brought Iran into a world of international commitments.
Australia and other countries have signed up to a range of international commitments to help reduce transnational crime.
Shakib Al Hasan's absence – he played only four matches because of international commitments – was barely felt as Russell filled in with aplomb.
None of that can be said about Richardson's compatriot Ricky Ponting, back in the Indian Premier League after a five-year absence because of international commitments as Australia's captain.
Yet ruling right-wing party Venstre and anti-immigration coalition partners the Danish People's Party (DPP) have said claims the measure is a violation of international commitments and human rights shows the law has been "grossly misunderstood".
Even as Mr. Putin was hailing the election, European monitors were taking a different view, contending that there had been "a clear abuse of power and a clear violation of international commitments and standards".
There can be no Cambodian settlement without some sort of international commitment & leadership, including the participation of China, the U.S. & the Soviet Union.
"The difference now," said Francesc Vendrell, the United Nations deputy envoy to Afghanistan, "is that there is a great deal of international commitment -- far more than there was in the early 90's here or in Somalia -- to really address these problems".
As in Rwanda, where Mr. Clinton apologized two years ago for America's failure to prevent genocide in 1994, the continuing mess in Sierra Leone reveals an absence of international commitment to peacekeeping in Africa.
Even when the most powerful countries in the world were queueing up last year to try to "kill" the Kyoto protocol and establish a new legal climate regime with different principles and provisions, he staunchly defended it as the only legally constituted working model of international commitment to reduce greenhouse gases.
The point is that to determine whether states should refrain from interfering with a group's unilateral attempt to create a new state on a portion of the territory of an existing state requires reflection on the nature and purposes of the international legal system, including the role of states and of international commitment to the preservation of their territorial integrity.
