Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(14)
Qualitative analysis using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) were carried out to study the morphology of each mix.
Eighteen samples – three of each mix design – were tested under static compression to determine the compressive strength and elastic modulus values.
It's very important to mention that this analysis is based on the 28 days compressive strength of each mix.
Mini slump flow test was performed at different time interval up to 90 min to evaluate the loss of slump flow of each mix.
For obtaining the main objective of this paper, three samples of each mix design reported in Table 3 were made and cured at different ages.
Notice that in the measurement and time-update equations of CPF, the updated mean and covariance of each mix and follow from the KF.
Similar(46)
Specimens for each test, except for the flowability test as it was performed once for each mix, were produced in replicas of three for each mix.
Proportional correction of the frequency of all markers was applied to give a total of 100% in each mix.
However, the current concrete mixing practice using an equal mixing time for all batches of each concrete mix design may lead to unnecessary mixing time and energy waste.
Frequency values after proportional correction to give a total of 100% in each mix.
After mixing, 8 μL of each master mix was placed into wells in a 384-well plate (enough for triplicate reactions for each isolation replicate).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com