Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
MICs were determined in triplicate and the modal value of each determination was considered.
In most cases, multiple estimations were carried out and means and SE of each determination have been reported.
Data from each patient was therefore considered on the basis of: total number of determinations expected for each considered parameter and value of each determination vs. established ranges for each parameter.
To better define the cost-effectiveness of pp65 and of HCMV DNA in predicting HCMV reactivation and disease, we considered the cost and technical required time of each determination.
Binding data were evaluated by fitting the means of each determination to both a one-site plus nonspecific binding equation [ y = (Bmax1 × x)/ Kd1 + x) + Ns] and a two-site binding equation [ y = (Bmax1 × x)/ Kd1 + x) + (Bmax2 × x)/ Kd2 + x)].
*non diabetic patients ° diabetic patients Percentages of data presence and data permanence within the set limits per parameter in relation to the length of the dialysis treatment *total number of determinations expected for each considered parameter ‡value of each determination vs. established ranges for each parameter.
Similar(54)
Duplicate dishes of cells for each determination were analysed.
The coefficient of variation for each determination was within 15% for both PBDEs and PCBs.
Samples of 5-10 breaths were analyzed for each determination of RL.
Analysis of 5 10 breaths was used for each determination of RL.
The results of four sets of experiments were combined for each determination.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com