Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
However, just as it would beg the question to use common beliefs about the external world to rule out a deceiving demon hypothesis, so it would also beg the question to argue against moral nihilism on the basis of common moral beliefs — no matter how obvious those beliefs might seem to us, and no matter how well these common beliefs cohere together (Sinnott-Armstrong 2006, chaps. 9-10).
Similar(59)
The content of common morality consists of moral rules and moral ideals.
This is, of course, contrary to common moral intuitions.
In the secular realm, we carry out our arguments — and develop our politics, each of us an autodidact — without the benefit of a common moral language or the bedrock of shared premises, and we sometimes appear fated, therefore, to retreat to our various ideological corners for good.
Henry Sidgwick, for instance, claims that 'the philosopher seeks unity of principle, and consistency of method' and that the role of the moral philosopher is to 'enunciate, in full breadth and clearness, those primary intuitions of Reason, by the scientific application of which the common moral thought of mankind may be at once systematised and corrected' (Sidgwick 1907 373–374).
This form of government has the virtue of fostering intelligence, common moral standards, and happiness; but where the citizens are unfit and passive it can be an instrument for tyranny, perhaps of one, as with Louis Napoleon, or perhaps of the many.
A cosmopolitan liberal theory of global justice thus begins with a conception of humanity as a common moral community of free and equal persons.
These four allegedly trans-cultural principles (respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice) would offer a common set of moral commitments, a common moral language and a common set of moral issues.
The social consequences of this deficit, and the actions we would take if it were overcome, point to Obama's faith in the power of empathy to provide common moral purpose.
The analysis grows out of attentive descriptions of ordinary linguistic usage and common moral and legal responses to various situations, and then proceeds to ask exactly what it is about harmful, coercive or exploitative behaviors that should merit our moral disapprobation, and under what circumstances (Emanuel and Hawkins 2008).
It is this joy of witnessing the past that becomes foreign to those who disavow the common moral horizon of humanity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com