Not in Front of the Children: "Indecency," Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth is a non-fiction book by attorney and civil libertarian Marjorie Heins about freedom of speech and the relationship between censorship and the "think of the children" argument.
He actually makes a "think of the children" argument, because Lord knows, he doesn't want to get tagged as a lazy pundit.
A new report from Political Research Associates, "The Right's Marriage Message: Talking Tolerance, Marketing Inequality," reveals the impact of the "Save Our Children" argument used by equality opponents and how we can continue to weaken its efficacy.
The intervention programs resulted in a significant overall improvement in the quality of children's argument writing.
This is significant since the first kind of argument – the welfare of the child argument – does little to distinguish between grandparents and anyone else.
Upon asking the circumstances leading to attempted and completed physical violence by husbands, the participants narrated that inability to give birth to a male child, lack of proper care of children, and arguments with in-laws led to the violent behavior of their husbands.
This production begins with an interpolated prologue of recorded voices, which appear to be engaged in one of those recriminatory parent-child arguments you hear in Lifetime movies and ads for family service agencies.
The group says it aims to support and empower Muslim women of all ages and backgrounds, and particularly to educate them so they can counter the arguments of children radicalized by reading on the Internet.
The closer they got, the more they heard: a passel of children spewed insults, their bitter argument punctuated by a crash of pewterware.
The argument that millions of children must have their lives snuffed out by failing schools and incompetent teachers just to keep impregnable the wall between church and state has worn thin in millions of homes, including my own.
