Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The success of any QSAR model depends on accuracy of the input data, selection of appropriate descriptors and statistical tools, and most importantly validation of the developed model.
For the development of such systems, some inherent problems must be solved: the selection of appropriate descriptors to represent images [1, 3]; the selection of appropriate similarity function to measure the similarity of the images being compared [1, 4]; and the definition of a suitable similarity threshold to be used by the systems [5 9].
Because of this huge data, the choice of selection of appropriate descriptors having a considerable role in governing the biological activity of interest becomes difficult.
Similar(56)
The history of structure activity relationships in drug design represents a long search for appropriate descriptors of broad biological action at the molecular level.
One hundred suggestions for appropriate descriptors of an ICC were received (representing 34 separate components).
In general, QSAR modelling requires three main features: a data set of molecules, appropriate descriptors and an efficient statistical method for capturing correlation.
As it was mentioned previously, when a physical chemistry expert develops a QSAR/QSPR predictive model, the choice of the most appropriate descriptors for this model constitutes the first complex challenge.
Thus, before accepting a multi-scale usage of an instrument, an important aspect that needs scrutinizing concerns whether there is sufficient discriminatory power across the factors and whether these factors are thus appropriate descriptors of truly independent theoretical dimensions [ 21].
The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine the most appropriate descriptors for the reporting of an ICC, by surveying researchers working in the field of cluster trials.
The values of aqueous electroaccepting power, ω+s, of 39 metal cations are quantitatively calculated, which are proven to be appropriate descriptors for the reduction reactions.
It's a place where clichés like charming and bucolic are appropriate descriptors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com