Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Further, Wydick (1999) observed a positive relationship between access to credit and propensity of working as a child labour in member households; however, the odds of working as a child in a household's business are higher when the borrowed fund is used for purchasing capital equipment instead of supporting operational activities.
Female OAC and those in good health had increased odds of working.
The odds of working are 4.3 times higher for those with more than 12 years of education.
The odds of working lactating mothers being anaemic was 29% less than their counterparts (AOR 0.71; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.80).
Unadjusted odds of working outdoors were greater for rural vs. urban respondents (p < 0.001) and this difference was maintained with adjustment for education, gender, age and SES, alone or in combination.
GPs whose parents had semi-routine or routine occupations had 4.3 times the odds of working in a deprived practice compared to those with parents from managerial and professional occupations (95 % CI 1.8 10.2, p = 0.001).
Similar(50)
Thus, when comparing the two periods, the richest wealth quintile showed an increase in the odds ratios of working women from 2005 to 2011.
Physical work conditions associated with increased odds of not working included those working in painful/tiring or standing positions at work.
Several work organisational factors were associated with greater odds of not working: workers with temporary/casual employment contracts compared to those with permanent contracts and workers with long week work schedules compared to those working ≤5 days.
While previous findings on socio-demographic and work factors were confirmed, a number of rarely examined variables were associated with increased odds of not working, including obesity, temporary employment, long day work schedules and financial insecurity.
While the overall BMI term did not have a significant association with not working in the overall model, obesity was significantly associated with increased odds of not working compared to the reference of normal BMI.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com