I wrote, not long ago, about the odd political significance of an orgy involving some obscure, photo-loving Communist Party officials.
Abbreviations: OR: Odds Ratio; CI: confidence intervals; P: statistical significance Significant P-values are in bold.
Odd, the durable significance of some places.
For the BPD group two models explained low proportions of the variance in the dependent variable and did not reach statistical significance (odd thinking/ unusual perceptual experiences: R = 0.14, F (4,23) = 0.91, p = 0.473; psychotic experiences: R = 0.10, F (4,23) = 0.65, p = 0.631) and none of PSP areas showed significant predictive value.
In the log-additive model (also called an allelic trend test), common homozygous genotypes (00) were assigned a value of 0, heterozygotes (01) a value of 1, and minor homozygous genotypes (11) a value of 2. Odds ratios and significance levels were then assessed using a logistic regression model.
Odds ratios and significance levels are provided in Table 4.
Odds ratio and significance not calculated because no females reported alcohol misuse.
Odds ratio and significance not calculated because no males reported sexual abuse during the past 6 months.
For patients on the GRU, age reached statistical significance (Odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.000 – 1.102, p = 0.049) (see Table 2).
Odds ratios with significance below 1 indicated an increase in motivation and job satisfaction and simultaneously a lower likelihood for intention to leave.
Further, gender almost reached statistical significance (Odds ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.22-1.04, p = 0.06), suggesting that the odds of males being repeat fallers are 1/0.48 or 2.1 times the odds of females being repeat fallers on the GRU.
