Sentence examples for ocular sensitivity from inspiring English sources

In analogy to synaesthetes, one might assume that photic sneezers show a different kind of neural organisation of the visual cortex in addition to an increased ocular sensitivity to light [48].

Screening pigment reduces ocular sensitivity within 23 min of exposure to light (Hamdorf & Höglund, 1981); the return to full ocular sensitivity is far slower, taking around 30 min (Bernhard & Ottoson, 1960).

However, moths attracted to a light will often rest on vegetation or the ground for a period of time, sometimes before even reaching the light (Hartstack et al., 1968; Hsiao, 1973); this behaviour could represent a period of readjustment to full ocular sensitivity.

The spectrum of eye symptomatology at presentation ranged from the absence of symptoms to eye redness, ocular pain, light sensitivity, blurred vision, and photophobia and to declining visual acuity, scotoma, and floaters.

To investigate the influence of timolol maleate 0.5% gel-forming solution and brinzolamide 1% ophthalmic suspension on contrast sensitivity, ocular higher-order aberration (HOA), and corneal surface light scattering.

Furthermore, increased penetration into the choroid and optic nerve head with reduced sensitivity to ocular opacities has been reported for OCT imaging in the water absorption window at 1050 nm compared to standard 850 nm wavelengths [ 19, 20].

One patient (patient 2) experienced a significant reduction of visual acuity to hand movement level, light sensitivity, and ocular pain during the first days of hospitalization.

To evaluate and compare changes in contrast sensitivity and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) and pseudo small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

They showed that flashed stimuli, which involves only the onset phase of rivalry, showed up to 20 times greater sensitivity to ocular dominance than continuously presented rivaling stimuli.

Sensitivity of ocular symptom screening was 7.7%, with a positive predictive value of 18% in this population.

If a false negative error is serious, as would be the case if diagnosing ocular tumours, a high sensitivity would take priority.