obviously no

USAGE SUMMARY

'obviously no' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you're expressing a clear negative in response to a question or suggestion. For example: Q: Would you like to go out for dinner tonight? A: Obviously no. I'm broke.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Obviously, no.

The New York Times - Sports

Obviously no heroin.

The Guardian - Film

Obviously no, it's absurd".

The Guardian

Fairly obviously, no.

The Guardian - Opinion

There was obviously no defense".

The New York Times

Obviously, no swimmer is perfect.

Independent

"Well, obviously, no," Linklater replied.

The New Yorker

The answer is obviously no.

The New York Times - Sports

There was obviously no carryover.

The New York Times - Sports

"Do I like this? Obviously, no.

The New York Times - Sports

Most obviously: no hotel rooms needed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "obviously no" to express a negative answer that is self-evident or widely understood to avoid unnecessary explanation. It's effective when the context makes the negative clear.

Common error

Avoid using "obviously no" in formal or academic writing where a more nuanced or detailed explanation is expected. In such contexts, provide a reasoned argument instead of relying on the perceived obviousness.

Linguistic Context

"Obviously no" functions as an emphatic negative response, indicating a clear and often self-evident rejection or disagreement. It combines an adverb of certainty (obviously) with a negative particle (no), reinforcing the negativity. As shown in Ludwig, this phrase is frequently used in responses where the answer is deemed self-explanatory.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "obviously no" is a frequently used phrase to express a clear and evident negative response. As indicated by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts, though less common in formal writing. The phrase combines the certainty of "obviously" with the negativity of "no", making it a direct and emphatic way to dismiss a question or suggestion. Its prevalence in news media and common conversation underscores its utility in everyday communication. When a more nuanced or detailed response is expected, consider using alternatives such as "clearly not" or providing a more reasoned explanation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

clearly not

Replaces "obviously" with "clearly", emphasizing the ease of understanding or perceiving the negative.

evidently not

Uses "evidently" to highlight that the negative is plain from the available information.

patently not

Employs "patently" to underscore that the negative is undeniably obvious.

plainly no

Uses "plainly" to indicate that the negative is straightforward and easy to see.

of course not

Adds a sense of certainty and expectation to the negative response.

absolutely not

Emphasizes the negativity with a strong affirmation.

certainly not

Highlights the surety of the negative.

assuredly no

Stresses the confidence in the negative response.

unquestionably not

Indicates that there is no room for doubt about the negative.

without a doubt no

Emphasizes that there is no uncertainty regarding the negative.

FAQs

How can I use "obviously no" in a sentence?

Use "obviously no" to give a clear and evident negative answer. For example, "Do you think this plan will work? Obviously no."

What are some alternatives to saying "obviously no"?

You can use alternatives like "clearly not", "of course not", or "absolutely not" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "obviously no"?

It is appropriate when the negative answer is self-evident or commonly understood. However, avoid using it in formal or academic settings where more detailed explanations are expected.

Is "obviously no" suitable for formal writing?

While grammatically correct, "obviously no" is generally considered informal. Formal writing often requires more elaborate and reasoned responses rather than relying on perceived obviousness.