For instance, while availability is a quantitative metric, it is obviously more intuitive for the user to express her requirements by using expressions such as High or Medium, rather than specifying precise numerical thresholds.
But since their connection obviously isn't intuitive, Hume challenges us to produce the "chain of reasoning" that takes us from propositions like (1) to propositions like (2) (EHU 4.2.16/34).
That was obviously not the most intuitive way of joining a beta program, but at the time, this idea fit in well with Google's obsession with all things Google+.
Obviously this is about as intuitive as a do-it-yourself colostomy kit but dammit look at those graphics.
Suffice it to say that the menus are counter-intuitive, inefficient, buggy, and obviously geared towards controller navigation.
Obviously, this is somewhat a counter-intuitive result that affects the interpretation of the biology behind our data.
The overall experience is pretty intuitive and straightforward, though there's obviously a tiny bit of lag before the service parses incoming emails.
Obviously, the choice γ = α, while being intuitive, is not essential for the SGoF procedure.
Obviously, on one level this is deeply counter-intuitive.
Obviously, they can help us form a clear and intuitive point of view about such problems.
