Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(50)
By induction, we obtain (i).
we obtain (i) and (ii): and.
Since I is C 1, we obtain I ′ ( u ) = 0.
Thus, we finally obtain (I(n geqxi) for all (nin[n_{k},m_{k}]).
By Fourier transform, we can obtain I u, v = O u, v · OTF u, v (2).
From (i) and (ii) of Lemma 2.1, we obtain (i) and (ii) of Theorem 1.1.
Similar(10)
Now, by the definition of S we obtain (I-S=sum_{jin J} gamma_{j} (I-T_{j} )) and clearly (F(S =bigcap_{jin J}F(T_{j})).
In any event, we could obtain I-labeled Ub-PESTc, in which PESTc was almost exclusively radioiodinated.
Since λ i ≥ 0, and λ i ≠ 0 for finitely many i ∈ I, from the feasibility of x and ( u, λ ) to (SIP) and (MWSID), respectively, we obtain ∑ i ∈ I λ i g i ( x ) ≤ 0 ≤ ∑ i ∈ I λ i g i ( u ).
Multiplying it by θ j and then summing over j, we obtain ∑ i μ i σ i = 0 which is not possible.
If f i (x, y) ≡ 0 for all (x, y) ∈ K × K in Theorem 2.1 and all i ∈ I, then, from the algorithm (D H ), we obtain, ∀ i ∈ I.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com