Suggestions(1)
Similar(60)
This study demonstrates that in the assessment of subcentimetre cervical cancers, endovaginal MRI using T2-W and diffusion-weighted imaging has a high sensitivity and specificity for experienced as well as inexperienced observers with good agreement between them for measurements of lesion size and volume.
As the observers' level of experience is important for good test reliability, all tests will be rated by the same experienced observer [ 66- 69].
Questions immediately arise for any observer: How good is a Cunningham dance when the Cunningham company is not performing it?
And for good reason, some observers said.
The new observer is applied to a Bullard dynamo, to show that the new observer obtains good state estimates even for trajectories very close to unobservability, for which the classical high-gain observer is affected by significant numerical errors.
Observers scored + 2 for excellent, + 1 for good resolution, 0 for fair, −1 for poor, and −2 for bad resolution in each assessment.
When the magazine killed the review, an enraged Thompson severed his ties with the National Observer for good.
The phase distributions for individual observers showed good agreement across the various repetitions; the dynamics however differed in some ways for the two stimuli.
Three observers reached good correlation for villous formations, the most pronounced form of hypertrophy, in RA; however, the results were not as good in spondylarthritis patients.
For change in the FASSS, the inter-observer reproducibility was good for the group of patients with MRIs performed within the shortest time interval (≤1 year) and excellent for the two groups with the longest time intervals between MRI scans.
The inter-observer agreement was good for the choice of a 'standard' or 'varus' stems (Kappa coefficient, 0.685), satisfactory for the size of the chosen stem (Kendall's tau, 0.797), and satisfactory for measurements of cortical distance (Kendall's tau, 0.642).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com