Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Basically, one therefore needs data from two sources: observed screen and clinical data.
The observed screen data are then consistent/compatible with a mammography sensitivity of 40% and a mean screen-detectable duration of 5 years.
We constructed two by two tables of observed screen and outcome positive and negative instances to estimate screening test characteristics with 95% CIs around the positive and negative likelihood ratios.
To correctly model the natural history of breast cancer, one has to estimate mean durations of the different pre-clinical phases, transition probabilities to clinical cancer stages, and sensitivity of the applied test based on observed screen and clinical data.
Similar(56)
Figure 1 (and Supplementary Material Table 7) outlines the observed screening pathway and detected tumour sizes.
In our study, we were additionally able to observe screening practices in younger patients with RA and to consider important contraindications to lipid-lowering therapy.
A more interesting phenomenon observed in screen capture data was that learners returned again to the first representation after manipulating the second, that is, the confirmatory manipulation.
11 There are, however, a number of alternative explanations for associations observed between screen time and psychosocial adjustment.
Broadly, substantially better survival was observed with screen detection for node-negative tumours of size 21 50 mm and node-positive tumours of size ⩽30 mm.
The confidence intervals of the effect estimates (observed with screening in 1992 2003/expected without screening in 1992 2003) were corrected with overdispersion constants produced by the two models (1.39/1.25).
We also varied assumed mortality reductions due to screening: 21% (observed for the screen group in ERSPC), 29% (observed for attendees in ERSPC), or 44% (observed for the screen group in ERSPC-Gothenburg).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com