Exact(55)
Figure 3 Risk-adjusted mortality minus observed mortality, plotted against observed costs minus risk-adjusted costs.
We compared observed mortality with expected mortality using the revised Baux score.
Yet, observed mortality was much superior to mortality as predicted by the SAPS II score.
The calibration is inadequate, but the differences between predicted and observed mortality are low.
The predicted and observed mortality rates were compared considering their 95% confidence interval.
Despite an expected mortality of 70%, observed mortality was 21%.
Table 2 shows observed mortality by institution and surgeon volume.
In addition, a particularly simple, but robust approach, is highlighted based on expected and observed mortality.
We plotted observed mortality by ICD exposure status using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Furthermore, it was not observed mortality or morbidity difference concerning this approach change.
Similar(1)
The observed mortality/expected mortality ratio with 95% confidence limits is shown in Fig. 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com