Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The proportion of specimen- vs observation-based occurrences differed greatly between classes (Fig. 4 middle).
Empirical (observation-based) truth is the stuff of science.
That's hardly a science-based argument!
And the argument for this sub-clause, this sub-argument, is a utility-based argument.
PWR 1: a course emphasizing writing and research-based argument.
Thus, any science-based argument is bound to fail.
Gilmore (2006) presents a relativity-based argument against locational endurantism.
A numbers-based argument is not among them.
In that analysis we also presented a novel structure-based argument for polarizing archaea.
However, this parsimony-based argument does not necessarily apply in every biological context.
In addition, a physics-based argument demonstrates that 35% is an appropriate choice.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com