Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
I understand that science relies upon observable fact and concrete proof.
Although the written word can explain a great deal, proof comes from observable action.
Donovan et al. (2014) showed that directed actions influence later performance, and found that trained actions can leave an observable 'legacy' in learners' subsequent gestures during proof production.
While there is no doubt that this effect exists, and is also easily observable during infancy [ 36], there is no proof that upright and inverted faces are not processed by the same populations of neurons within the occipito/temporal cortex.
This way to block the KS proof comes to understanding f(Q) and g(P) as different observables (because of sensitivity to context), thus it amounts to rejecting NC.
In fact, according to John Bell (Mermin 1993, p. 805), von Neumann's assumptions (about the relationships among the values of quantum observables that must be satisfied in a hidden-variables theory) are so unreasonable that the "the proof of von Neumann is not merely false but foolish!" Nonetheless, some physicists continue to rely on von Neumann's proof.
More recently proofs involving less observables have been given by (among many others) Peres (1991, 1995) for x=3 and y=33, by Kernaghan (1994) for x=4 and y=20 and by Cabello et al. (1996) for x=4 and y=18.
Change is observable time.
Second, obesity is easily observable.
Only the latter is observable.
They have no observable impact.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com