The phrase "objects of regulation" is correct and usable in written English.
It refers to the things or entities that are subject to regulation or control. It can be used in a variety of situations, such as discussing government policies, laws, or rules that aim to regulate certain aspects of society or business. Example: The objects of regulation in the new law include large corporations, individual investors, and consumer goods companies.
That something is an object of regulation is an important fact.
eNOS and nNOS are constitutively expressed in endothelial cells and neurons, respectively, and their expression is the object of regulation at the transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels.
That would be the object of regulation: Protect the public, protect the U.S.A., but allow the entrepreneurs to be amply rewarded.
In this respect informality is conceived not as an object of regulation of the State but, on the contrary, a product or the outcome of this regulation, or as a state of exception.8 Only formal structures and rules have the power to determine what is formal and what is not (Roy 2005).
Despite the wide circulation of the term and its inclusion in the Oxford English Dictionary, a review of the literature shows that nutraceuticals do not yet constitute a legal entity or specific object of regulation in any country.
* * * Nor does it make any difference that such regulations incidentally affect interstate commerce, when the object of the regulation is not to that end, but is a legitimate attempt to protect the people of the state.' Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U.S. 52, 59, 60, 35 S.Ct.
Sulfur is a critical polluting component of diesel and has been the object of much regulation.
In the face of readily available alternatives that might prevent abuse of the program, Congress did not choose a method of reducing abuses that was 'fairly related to the object of the regulation,' by enacting the statute challenged in this case.
As Mr. Justice Jackson put it, the Government 'must exercise (its) powers so as not to discriminate between (its) inhabitants except upon some reasonable differentiation fairly related to the object of the regulation.' Railway Express Agency v. New York, 336 U.S. 106, 112, 69 S.Ct.
