Sentence examples for objects of experiences from inspiring English sources

Usually, the objects of experiences are not constituted by their experiences: they are something mind independent and not immanent to consciousness.

Indeed these concepts primarily apply to objects of experiences typically generated by these modalities, rather than to the experiences themselves (or if they do, only derivatively).

The orthodox representationalist and the sense-datum theorist have simple accounts of these entailments in terms of the structure of the objects of experiences (apparent structure, for the representationalist; actual structure, for the sense-datum theorist).

This is because he explains qualia as "the ways objects phenomenally appear or seem" (1995, 73), and red is one way that tomatoes appear.[5] Qualia, on Dretske's use, are properties of objects of experiences; in this article qualia are properties of experiences.

So the synthetic a priori principle of cause and effect is also a criterion of the objectivity of objects of experience.

Hence, assuming the strongest version of transcendental idealism, every such principle tells us how one of the categories partially constitutes objects of experience in general, by determining an objectively real phenomenal structure across all possible worlds of human experience.

As we saw in the supplement Completing the Picture of Kant's Metaphysics of Judgment, the Second Analogy of Experience, if true, guarantees both the objectivity and the universal diachronic or temporally successive causal necessitation of objects of experience and all of their parts, under natural laws.

Rather, what is spatial appears to be a sort of order of the material objects of experience.

His program of describing experience and "bracketing" the objects of experience, in the pursuit of essences of types of experience, was in part taken up in the phenomenology of religion.

One major problem that the Essay appeared to raise is that if ideas are indeed the immediate objects of experience, how is it possible to know that there is anything beyond them e.g., ordinary physical objects?

The Leibnizian metaphysics, the object of Kant's attack, is criticized for assuming that the human mind can arrive by pure thought at truths about entities which, by their very nature, can never be objects of experience, such as God, freedom, and immortality.