This study is a unique endeavor, with clear objectives, to answer the need of radioiodine as an adjuvant therapy and the long-term outcome in DTC patients who are at LR of recurrence and compared against similar number of patients who were surgically ablated and not given RAI.
His objective is to answer the very good question, Who were these people?
More specifically, our objective was to answer the following question: Given a specific set of ROIs (i.e., brain regions), how similar are the volumes and time courses extracted by different ROI selection methods, and how similar are results from connectivity analyses performed on these volumes and time courses?
Specifically, our objective was to answer the question: can we exploit this knowledge to improve the molecular classification of EPCs in response to Ado treatment?
A secondary objective was to answer the question whether there is a difference between invasive MV and non-invasive MV (NIV) in the risk for AKI.
In this context our objective was to answer the following questions: Is a teaching file with access anytime anywhere within the radiologic department and smooth integration into routine workflow feasible from a technical point of view?
Our objective was to answer the question 'what do clinicians and frontline workers need to know in order to provide appropriate care to women who may experience co-occurring IPV, mental health and/or substance use problems?' An initial scoping review of articles published between 2005 and 2010 was completed in January 2010 using Scholars Portal databases.
In this systematic review, our primary objective was to answer the following questions: does invasive MV contribute to the development of AKI in critically ill adult patients, and could differences in ventilator settings like tidal volume (Vt) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have an effect on the development of AKI?
Our objective was to answer the question: "Does fetal developmental exposure to PFOA affect fetal growth in humans?" We developed a PECO (participants, exposure, comparator, and outcomes) statement, which is used as an aid to developing an answerable question (Higgins and Green 2011).
Those policy objectives are, to answer the statutory question, in my opinion valid".
In this paper, our objectives were to answer the following general questions.
