Suggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Objective discomfort for the patient due to the wide field of the device.
Disadvantages of circular external fixator include: A long learning curve Objective discomfort for the patient due to the wide field of the device Nonrigid fixation due to flexible metal wires and percutaneous screws Cutaneous infections frequently occur at wire entry sites Loosening and breakage of percutaneous screws Long treatment times.
For estimating objective discomfort, a generic scale, such as the National Eye Institute Vision Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), and a disease specific questionnaire, such as the Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) and the OSDI, have typically been used.
Similar(57)
The calculated objective thermal discomfort indexes show certain deviation from the real responses of the visitors.
where Q i is the ith objective visual discomfort score and MOS i is the corresponding ith MOS score.
Table 7 Results of the F-test performed on the residuals between objective visual discomfort predictions and MOS values at a significance level of 99.9 % Kim Park DFLOW UM DF NSS DF (UM+NSS) DF Kim – 0 0 0 0 0 Park 1 – 1 1 – 0 DFLOW 1 0 – 0 0 0 UM DF 1 0 1 – 0 0 NSS DF 1 – 1 1 – 0 (UM+NSS) DF 1 1 1 1 1 –.
Subjective and objective pain and discomfort rating scales were used to assess the perception of the subject, parent and attending nurse.
The radius was of particular interest as it gave a measure of the overall CoP shifting, such that the larger the radius, the more the shift, and the greater the objective measure of discomfort.
A large correlation is observed between the subjective and objective measures of driver discomfort and provides the opportunity for long term discomfort evaluations to be made via remote monitoring; removing the need for subjective assessment.
The third one is to propose an objective model for visual discomfort.
This thickening of the nodes is not just the objective cause of the discomfort, it is an objective failure of the lymphatic system to make its normal contribution to the overall system.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com