Sentence examples for objections why from inspiring English sources

It was here also, during Eisenhower's presidency, that Teller generated a stream of technical objections why it would be impossible to maintain and monitor a test ban with an enemy as devious as the Soviets.

If anything, the movie is mapped out with such controlling care that it occasionally feels airless and unpeopled, leaving us with practical objections: Why do we so rarely see the rest of the staff?

In particular, the opening of entirely new networks to big, fast-growing but previously underserved cities in emerging economies is both a feature and a stimulant of globalisation.There are good reasons, such as the scarcity of land and local environmental objections, why cities like London and New York no longer wish to accommodate ever-expanding mega-hub airports.

Mrs Bloomfield said she was "baffled at this statement", adding: "If they never had an objection, why build the wall?

Objection: Why aren't you working to improve the animal welfare laws already on the books to protect non-human sentient beings?

Avicenna also devotes considerable attention to this objection: "Why is the end considered a prior cause when in fact it is an effect of the other causes?"(Avicenna MH: 220, trans. modified).

Maybe one of those objections is why Kirk, approaching the edge of the Neutral Zone, decides to disobey orders and lead a landing party to capture Harrison.

Those objections are why it was left out of the bill in the first place, despite vigorous advocacy from gay-rights groups.

A third version of the objection queries why controversial religious arguments, claims about the good life, or metaphysical arguments, are excluded from playing a role in public reason, but controversial arguments about justice or individual rights are not similarly excluded.

Roosevelt "rather laughed off" the objections, telling Jackson: "Why, Bob, you're the only man in the government who isn't coming to me asking for more employees, more money, and a bigger department.

Attempts to defend special obligations run up against objections from insiders – why suppose that I am obligated to do more for certain persons just because I happen to stand in some special relationship to them? – and also from outsiders – why do other persons get more benefits just because they happen to stand in special relationships to other persons?