Sentence examples for objections discussed from inspiring English sources

Objections discussed in previous sections may be raised with respect to Stocker's account.

Of course some of the objections discussed above target more than one version of higher-order theory, while still not being fully general in scope.

In addition, there is no presumption that the objections discussed below are the most important or that the initial replies to them are without fault.

From the mid 1960s until the mid 1990s, most philosophers thought rule-consequentialism couldn't survive the objections discussed in the previous section.

The debate between Pogge and his critics, of course, continues (see Pogge 2010b); Pogge is able to offer rejoinders to many of the objections discussed here.

This aim induces a number of practical problems concerning moral reform and motivation, some of which are raised in a series of objections discussed in the "Inclusive Care" texts.

This debate is clearly closely related to Scheffler's discussion of the distribuitive objection discussed above.

The first epistemological objection discussed above questions step (d).

One issue that comes in from the start is the principled basis objection discussed earlier.

A first, very general, objection discussed by Long states that direct experimentation on the target living system is preferable over experimentation on a model (i.e., an abstract and idealized representation) of it.

In reply to the stronger sort of objection discussed earlier, it may be suggested that, necessarily, for any power, if an agent lacks that power, then an omnipotent being could give that agent that power (Wierenga 1989, p. 29).