Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
objectionable video
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "objectionable video" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a video that is considered offensive, inappropriate, or unacceptable in some context. Example: "The platform removed the objectionable video after receiving numerous complaints from users."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
MILAN — Lawyers for Google rested their case in defense of four executives charged in Italy with failing to comply with privacy laws, telling a judge that the company has a mechanism in place to rapidly remove objectionable video from its site.
News & Media
Algorithm B: High performance objectionable video classification system [11].
Lee et al., [11] used two models of features for objectionable video classification.
To compare the results of the proposed algorithm with those of other methods, we implemented the following algorithms: Algorithm A: Hierarchical system for objectionable video detection [12].
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
With Android's YouTube app, users can filter objectionable videos, but in my experience the filter wasn't completely reliable.
News & Media
Objectionable videos were then extracted by motion-based features.
Finally, objectionable videos were recognized by the video estimation algorithm.
In [30], several algorithms for skin detection in objectionable videos were compared.
Therefore, the algorithm could not recognize objectionable videos with global motions or videos with no considerable motion.
It was shown that the mixture of Gaussian models is a proper choice for skin detection in objectionable videos.
They extended their work [12] to a multilevel hierarchical system, which utilized very similar features for detecting objectionable videos.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a video as "objectionable", be specific about the reasons why it is considered so. Provide context to help your audience understand the nature of the objections.
Common error
Avoid simply labeling a video as "objectionable" without explaining what specific elements are problematic. Lack of context can lead to misinterpretations and misunderstandings.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "objectionable video" functions as an adjective-noun combination. The adjective objectionable modifies the noun video, indicating a video that is likely to cause disapproval or dissent. As supported by Ludwig, the phrase is usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "objectionable video" is used to describe videos that are deemed offensive or inappropriate. Ludwig AI indicates it's grammatically correct. While relatively infrequent, its usage is commonly found in contexts such as News & Media and Science. When using this phrase, it is crucial to provide specific reasons for the objection to avoid vagueness. Related terms include "offensive video" and "inappropriate video", offering alternative ways to convey similar meanings. The phrase carries a neutral tone and serves to categorize potentially problematic content.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
offensive video
Focuses specifically on the offensive nature of the video content.
inappropriate video
Highlights the unsuitability of the video for certain audiences or contexts.
unacceptable video
Emphasizes that the video doesn't meet established standards or expectations.
contentious video
Suggests the video is likely to cause disagreement or controversy.
questionable video
Implies doubt about the appropriateness or legality of the video.
problematic video
Highlights that the video presents certain issues or difficulties.
controversial video
Indicates widespread disagreement or strong public opposition to the video.
unsuitable video
Similar to inappropriate, but emphasizes a lack of fitness for a specific purpose.
censored video
Specifies that the video has been suppressed or removed due to its content.
restricted video
Indicates limited access to the video, often due to age or content restrictions.
FAQs
What does "objectionable video" mean?
An "objectionable video" is one that contains content considered offensive, inappropriate, or morally wrong by certain standards or viewers. The reasons for objection can vary widely.
What are some synonyms for "objectionable video"?
Alternatives include "offensive video", "inappropriate video", or "controversial video", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
How can I report an "objectionable video" on YouTube?
YouTube provides a flagging system where users can report videos that violate its community guidelines. The platform then reviews the flagged content and takes appropriate action if necessary.
What factors determine if a video is considered "objectionable"?
Factors can include violence, hate speech, sexually explicit content, promotion of illegal activities, or violation of privacy. What is deemed "objectionable" can also depend on cultural and ethical considerations.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested