Sentence examples for objection point from inspiring English sources

One objection point mentioned in most of the studies on bisphosphonates is the doses at which the antitumoral effect is achieved.

This objection points out that a person can have no more control over a purely random action than he has over an action that is deterministically inevitable; in neither case does free will enter the picture.

He is particularly troubled by the loud public events held in the square, which do not encourage the contemplative appreciation of art.A more ideological strand of objection points out that many spaces made available to the public such as Granary Square and More London, an area of offices and shops on the riverbank by City Hall are actually owned by the developers.

One version of this objection points to the indeterminacy of the idea of ownership.

At best the objection points to a problem we must face anyway (for the case of similarity).

That objection points not only to the effect that noncoercive state perfectionism can have on autonomous decision making, but also to its potentially insulting character.

Another objection points out that appropriation without restrictions makes it possible that one person could own the entire world, thereby effectively putting the remaining propertyless persons in the problematic condition of requiring the owner's permission to do anything.

The third objection points out that even if we do not accept the comparability of the musical and legal careers in Raz's example, some versions of the musical career and legal career appear comparable.

A second, less strident, version of this objection points out that even those theories of public reason that are not explicitly secular will nevertheless make it more difficult, on balance, for religious citizens to justify their favored views.

A different objection points out that taking organs without consent will sometimes be against the wishes of the deceased; and while not taking will be against the wishes of the deceased who had wanted to donate, taking in error is a worse mistake than not taking in error, because people have a right not to have their organs taken but no right to have their organs taken (Veatch 2000).

But this brings us to another objection, pointing to the future.