Suggestions(5)
Exact(4)
Because Western law gives great emphasis to the concept of possession, it has had considerable difficulty in making intangible things the object of property.
In Western law today, most tangible things may be the object of property, although certain kinds of natural resources, such as wild animals, water, and minerals, may be the object of special rules, particularly as to how they are to be acquired.
Privilege is a way of framing social inequity that carries a lot of baggage: in describing its history in terms of racial oppression, theorist Cheryl Harris regarded white privilege as a "source of protection; [its] absence meant being the object of property".
In an important article, "On Being the Object of Property," African-American law professor Patricia Williams offers a critique of the contract metaphor itself.
Similar(56)
Because the objects of property and the protected relations are different in every culture and vary according to law, custom, and economic system and the relative social status of those who enjoy its privileges, it is difficult to find a least common denominator of "ownership".
It is tied to institutionalized ideology about our bodies as sexualized objects of property, as spectacles of sexuality and deviant sexual desire.
The exact extent to which tissues collected for research purposes can be regarded as objects of property, and who has the ultimate ownership over them remains undetermined.
Religious and anti-poverty groups added that energy networks should not be the object of private property, but run as public resources instead.
In Anglo-American law, a legacy of an identified object, such as a particular piece of real estate, or a described object of personal property, is called a specific legacy.
If the object of a property is constant, it works as a filter on result values.
The haecceity or thisness of an object, the property of being (identical to) that very object, provides a trivial example of an individual essence for each object.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com