Exact(1)
In some cases the satisfaction of the Acceptance Condition is sufficient for the satisfaction of the Success Condition in the sense that if an author has produced an object with an intention to make an object of kind K and has accepted it as a K-object, it cannot fail to be a K-object.
Similar(58)
A purely extensional version of the criterion is plainly inadequate: $T$ is ontologically committed to objects of kind $K$ if, and only if, $T$ is true only if the variables range over objects of kind $K$.
This is then alleged to be evidence that quotations can be used to refer to objects of kind O.
If there is someone who believes that some objects of kind x exist substantially the Madhyamaka will produce an argument to show that these objects really lack svabhāva.
Quine's advice comes accompanied with a criterion of ontological commitment whereby an appropriately regimented body of doctrine is ontologically committed to objects of kind $K$ just in case objects of kind $K$ must lie in the range of our bound variables for the sentences of our theory to be true.
For example, we are committed to the existence of objects of kind $K$ if a proper regimentation of our best global theory includes or entails a sentence of the form $\exists x \ Fx$, where $F$ is a predicate under which only objects of kind $K$ fall.
Under Quine's approach to ontology, an argument for the existence of objects of kind $K$—whether mereologically complex objects, or concrete possible worlds, or mathematical objects takes the form of an argument for the thesis that quantification over such objects is indispensable to our best global theory of the world.
The last is connected to the first two since if proper parts of an object of that kind are themselves of that kind, then it is not clear that one can count things of that kind.
I never want them to be thinking about me as a sexual object of any kind.
Being able to appreciate an object of this kind was what Kendall had always appreciated about himself.
Samuel van Hoogstraten – A Peepshow with Views of the Interior of a Dutch House (c 1655-60) This delightful optical toy is the only object of its kind in the National Gallery.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com