Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(24)
According to Auriol, in any cognitive act — whether sensory or intellectual — the cognitive power puts the object of cognition into this special type of existence, and the object of cognition in this special type of existence is the object as perceived.
All cognition takes place because a cognitive faculty places the object of cognition into esse apparens, which is merely the object of cognition in a different type of being than it has extra-mentally, the being of being perceived.
Central to this is Auriol's theory of apparent existence or esse apparens, that, at all levels, our cognitive faculties, in the very process of cognizing, put the object of cognition into a special type of existence, termed by Auriol "apparent existence" (esse apparens).
The volume is an introduction to one of the key concepts in Tibetan Buddhist epistemology, namely the object of cognition.
Next, Olivi argues that species would have to be the first object of cognition.
Not one of the three possibilities is, on Yogācāra's account, admissible as the object of cognition however.
Similar(36)
Dignāga, thus, appears to be claiming that all objects of cognition, whether external or internal, cannot be properly understood if separated from the types of cognitive events in which they are instantiated, a view best described as phenomenalism.
Like the other empiricists of his time, Hume believed that the immediate objects of cognition are representations.
As the material elements form the objects of cognition, the mandala depicting the rishin represents the known.
This means, according to Kant, that idealism in epistemology is inescapable, because the assumption of the conceptual constitution of objects of cognition is unavoidable.
But Olivi works very hard to avoid falling into any kind of position that might be called representationalist that is, a view on which the immediate objects of cognition are internal.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com