Sentence examples for object conceptions from inspiring English sources

The theory and object conceptions are no different: each has provoked a number of different questions and criticisms.

So there seems no reason to suppose that either the theory or object conception is providing anything else but a way of understanding the notion of the physical.

Table 2 shows the kinds of student work that represents an action conception, a process conception, an object conception and a well-functioning schema in derivatives of trigonometric functions.

I adapted Maharaj (2013) to develop a table of examples of what student work represents, namely, an action conception, a process conception, an object conception and a well-functioning schema.

However, if this is correct, it would seem that the physical properties described by the theory conception are only a sub-class of the physical properties described by the object conception.

Other students who have a complete process conception of 0.999... may not yet be able to "encapsulate" that process into an "object conception", like the object conception they have of 1, and so they view the process 0.999... and the object 1 as incompatible.

Hempel's dilemma against the theory-conception is similar to an objection that one often hears propounded against the object-conception (cf. Jackson 1998).

If that is right, however, then the possibility emerges that the theory- and the object-conceptions characterize distinct classes of properties.

(b) The relation between, and the adequacy of, the theory-conception and the object-conception of the physical.

But leaves open the possibility that one might appeal to the object-conception of the physical to define a version of physicalism which evades the knowledge argument.

It seems intuitively not; however, if physicalism is defined via reference to the object-conception of a physical property then it is hard to see why not.