Suggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Method 2: By aggregating numerical judgment (assigned or/and computed judgment) from users that have similar contexts.
There are three possible methods: Method 1: By aggregating all users' numerical judgment (assigned or/and computed judgment) computed for each criteria.
Accurate numerical judgment representations are of high importance for the QFD team to fill in the values of each of those components.
In the literature, the comparison pairwise matrix (CPM) ((p_{ij})) for each criterion pair (i) and (j )is given by (p_{ij} = C_{i }/ C_{j}), where (C_{i}) and (C_{j}) are the user assigned numerical judgment (value: 1 9) of criterion (i) and (j), respectively [41].
The conclusion is that if uncertainties are not included, the classical multi criteria methodologies evaluated could not be used to predict the successful deployment of PWR, BWR and CANDU, with the status of knowledge of 1956, and without including others factors and external non numerical judgment.
The study used a whole-brain approach in order to explore the distributed network of brain areas involved in non-symbolic approximate numerical judgment.
Similar(53)
In this paper, the multiple attribute decision method known as analytical hierarchy process (AHP), which uses pairwise comparisons with numerical judgments, is considered.
Many of these brain areas have been implicated in non-symbolic and symbolic numerical judgments in previous studies [5], [7].
Several authors believe that the capacity of rapid and accurate numerical judgments on small sets of items is based on an object-tracking system [21], [22].
Several studies, using different fMRI paradigms to compare activation between numerical activity and control tasks have replicated the involvement of hIPS in both symbolic and non-symbolic numerical judgments [4].
For example, a recent study found increased activation in the hIPS and in frontal regions, irrespective of whether digits, dots, or number words were used in numerical judgments [4].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com