number of worker

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "number of workers" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you need to refer to a quantity of workers or personnel. For example, "The company employs a large number of workers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

37 human-written examples

But actually, the total number of worker hours does not necessarily change.

The New York Times

Other countries, including Germany, Canada, and France, have rewritten their laws to expand the number of worker categories.

The New Yorker

The result is an apparent drop in the number of worker hours required to produce goods — and thus increased productivity.

The New York Times

Independent contractors are not eligible for a number of worker protections, including the minimum wage, overtime pay, workers' compensation and the reimbursement of expenses, such as the cost of gas for drivers.

The Guardian - Tech

Correction: This article was amended on Monday 11 August to clarify that the deaths of over 1,000 migrant workers are not connected to construction of the Al-Wakrah World Cup stadium, but instead the total number of worker deaths in Qatar since the World Cup was awarded to the country in 2010.

The Guardian

Total number of worker category.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

20 human-written examples

Best known for its Fat Tire beer, New Belgium is one of a small but growing number of worker-owned US companies.

The Guardian

Growth in GDP per head declines less sharply because populations start to decline, but living standards will still be 20% lower in 2050 than if there had been no ageing.At the same time, the fiscal burden on the diminishing number of worker-bees will rise as more people turn into pensioner drones.

The Economist

The number of workers involved is unclear.

The New York Times

The number of workers was in fact 70.

The Guardian

During the crisis, the number of workers being dismissed rose above the number of workers quitting, but now departures are more likely to be voluntary, at least officially.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing workforce capacity, use "number of workers" to maintain clarity and professionalism in your writing. For example, "The project requires a specific number of workers to be completed on time".

Common error

Avoid using "numbers of worker" as it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "number of workers", which is the accepted plural form.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "number of worker" functions as a noun phrase that generally acts as a subject or object in a sentence. It denotes a specific quantity of individuals engaged in work, as shown in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "number of worker" is a noun phrase used to quantify the workforce in various contexts. While generally correct, it is more frequently used as "number of workers". As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is found in professional, news, and general settings, and its grammatical status is correct. It’s essential to avoid common errors, such as using "numbers of worker" and, instead, stick to "number of workers" for accurate and professional communication. The most common contexts include science and news, as illustrated in Ludwig's examples, with authoritative sources being The New York Times and The Guardian.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

workforce size

Replaces "number of worker" with a more concise term indicating the total number of employees.

employee count

Substitutes "number of worker" with a synonym emphasizing the act of counting employees.

staffing level

Changes "number of worker" to a term describing the degree to which a company is staffed.

personnel quantity

Replaces "number of worker" with a more formal way to indicate the quantity of personnel.

labor force size

Swaps "number of worker" with a term specifying the magnitude of the labor force.

headcount of workers

Adds 'headcount' to "number of worker" to emphasize the enumeration of individuals.

total workers

Simplifies "number of worker" to emphasize the total number of workers without focusing on the enumeration.

worker population

Changes "number of worker" to refer to the population constituted by the workers.

amount of staff

Substitutes "number of worker" with terms that focus on the amount of staff members.

strength of the workforce

Changes "number of worker" to an idiomatic expression referring to size and capability.

FAQs

How do I use "number of worker" in a sentence?

You can use "number of worker" to indicate the quantity of personnel in a specific context. For example, "The "number of employees" required for the project is substantial".

What can I say instead of "number of worker"?

Alternatives to "number of worker" include "workforce size", "employee count", or "staffing level", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "number of worker" or "number of workers"?

"Number of workers" is correct. "Number of worker" is grammatically incorrect.

What is the difference between "number of worker" and "workforce size"?

"Number of worker" is grammatically incorrect and should be "number of workers". "Workforce size" is a more concise term that conveys the same meaning as "number of workers".