number of work

USAGE SUMMARY

"number of work" is not correct and usable in written English.
It is likely a mistranslation or misuse of the term "workforce" or "number of employees." The phrase "number of work" does not make sense grammatically or contextually, and there is no specific situation or sentence in which it would be appropriate to use it. Example: "The company's workforce has doubled in the last year, increasing the number of work done and improving productivity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

A limited number of "work of share" options are also available to students.

Cornell University

When divided by the number of work days each month, we see an encouraging trend.

The New York Times

This is easily done: simply reduce the total number of work permits.

The Economist

The number of work weeks will drop to 40 from 52, with four weeks vacation.

The New York Times

The number of work permit applications has grown 60% to 80,000 in the past five years.

The Guardian - Tech

After studying journalism, she got the job in 2009 following a number of work experience placements at various publications.

The Guardian

Anne Bruce grew uncomfortable about what she had posted when a number of work acquaintances befriended her on Facebook.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

Despite a large media coverage of the phenomenon, the number of work-related suicides is currently unknown in France.

Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique

Since 1992, the number of work-related injuries and illnesses has fallen 25percentto to 6.7 per 100 full-time workers from 8.9.

The New York Times

In the rest of New York State, the number of work-related fatalities rose slightly, to 151 from 147, Mr. Dolfman said.

The New York Times

The number of work-related visas issued in the year to June 2012 fell by 7%.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "number of work" in formal writing. Replace it with grammatically correct alternatives like "workforce size", "number of employees", or "volume of work" to maintain clarity and professionalism.

Common error

Do not directly translate concepts into English without verifying grammatical correctness. The phrase "number of work" is not standard English and should be corrected to "number of employees" or another suitable alternative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "number of work" functions as a noun phrase intended to quantify labor or workforce. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. While frequently used, it does not adhere to standard English grammar rules and requires correction for clarity and accuracy.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

40%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

8%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "number of work" appears frequently in diverse sources, it's grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI points out, alternatives like "workforce size", "number of employees", or "volume of work" provide clearer and more accurate ways to convey the intended meaning. Despite its common usage, relying on grammatically sound alternatives enhances professionalism and clarity in communication. Always consider the context and audience when selecting the most appropriate replacement phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

workforce numbers

Directly addresses counts of workers, fixing the initial grammatical error with a clearer term.

workforce size

Replaces "number of work" with a direct reference to the size of the employed population, correcting the grammatical structure.

number of employees

Specifies "employees" as the subjects being counted, resulting in better clarity and grammatical correctness.

staff count

Provides a precise measure of staff numbers, avoiding the grammatical error.

employee headcount

Synonymous to "staff count", referring specifically to the tally of staff members.

volume of work

Shifts the focus to the amount of work performed instead of the workers themselves, altering the perspective.

personnel numbers

Replaces the phrase with a more formal and accurate term that refers to the number of staff.

workload

This refers to the amount of work that needs to be done or the amount that someone is doing and it's more about the load rather than people doing it.

amount of labor

Uses "labor" to describe work, focusing on the effort expended and correcting grammatical issues.

quantity of tasks

Emphasizes the number of tasks completed, changing the emphasis from workforce to completed actions.

FAQs

What's wrong with using "number of work"?

The phrase "number of work" is grammatically incorrect in English. It doesn't follow standard English syntax. Use alternatives like "workforce size" or "number of employees" instead.

What can I say instead of "number of work"?

You can use alternatives like "workforce size", "number of employees", or "volume of work" depending on the context.

How do I correctly refer to the size of a company's staff?

Instead of saying "number of work", use phrases such as "staff count", "employee headcount", or "personnel numbers" to accurately describe the staff size.

Which is correct, "number of work" or "number of employees"?

"Number of employees" is the correct and grammatically sound phrase. "Number of work" is not standard English and should be avoided. Always opt for "number of employees" to ensure clear communication.